Take careful note of the following details regarding the examination procedures so that you know what is expected of you:
• Examinations will take place on the dates provided in the above section.
• Familiarise yourself with the exam timetable and be prepared to write the exams on thestipulated days. The exam timetables are final and no changes will be considered.
• Personal Examination Timetables required by students for study leave, for submission to the Department of Education, will be posted to you. Should you not receive this timetable two weeks before the exams are due, please contact the call centre on 018285 5900 immediately.
• Examination papers are set and marked by lecturers and mentors from the North-West University.
• The final promotion is done by an examination panel from the University.
• If you fail a module during the March/April examination, you will have the opportunity to rewrite the module the following examination opportunity. If you fail a subject again during the September/October examination you will have to re-register for the module to
obtain the opportunity to write it again in April the following year.
• Examination regulations appear on each answer book. Any irregularities during examinations are considered a serious offence and the necessary steps will be taken.
• Dishonesty during the examination may lead to the expulsion of the candidate form the course.
Policy on Plagiarism and other forms of Academic Dishonesty or
As a pre-eminent university in Africa, driven by the pursuit of knowledge and innovation, with a unique institutional culture based upon the values the University espouses, the North-West University has adopted this Policy on Plagiarism and other forms of Academic Dishonesty and Misconduct on 10 June 2011 . This policy replaces the Policy on Academic Dishonesty adopted by Council on 21 September 2007.
The focus of a University is on scholarship, the practice of scientific disciplines. Science is discovered/researched, taught, learnt and made useful to satisfy legitimate needs. Scientific knowledge is constantly disseminated by those who teach and are taught, those who learn and
those who render research results. Scientific communication is therefore at the root of the activities of theUniversity.
A distinction between what is scientific and pre-scientific is situated in the way in which scientific information is communicated regardless of whether this is in the context of learning, teaching, research or application of knowledge. Scientific communication must pass the test of correctness, defensibility and (especially in the case of research) originality. The scientific practice of students and scientists is adjudicated and evaluated on an ongoing basis. For that reason, integrity and therefore honesty, apart from obvious moral considerations, is an essential factor in the practice of science or scholarship. It is therefore expected of anybody engaged in scientific work that the relevant individual should assume sole responsibility for the content of his or her scientific communication. To present at any level as one’s own work the knowledge, insights, wording or formulation of anybody else within the context of teaching, learning, research activities or the application of knowledge without acknowledgement is unacceptable and the blameworthiness is comparable with crimes such as theft and fraud.
Dishonest academic conduct constitutes serious misconduct, whether it occurs orally, by conduct or in writing, during examinations or in the context of other forms of assessment such as assignments, theses, as well as in reports and publications.
Therefore it is the policy of the North-West University that no form of academic dishonesty shall be tolerated, and if any of such conduct is reported or detected, the perpetrator upon being found guilty shall be punishable in terms of the University’s disciplinary policies, rules and procedures. The University has the responsibility to inculcate integrity and its corollary of academic honesty in all students and staff, especially those in academic positions.
Various acts related to academic misconduct or academic dishonesty can be identified within the contexts of examination processes and other forms of academic assessment. These will be outlined in more detail provided below.
3.1 Examination dishonesty
The generic definition of examination dishonesty includes:
The presentation for purposes of academic assessment of any material as being the work of the person presenting it while it contains elements of work done by another person, without acknowledgement being given to the latter.
Policy on Plagiarism and other forms of Academic Dishonesty and Misconduct 1
The unlawful use (that is, without the explicit permission of the assessor) of academic sources includes,
but is not limited to, self-produced notes, regardless of the format of such notes or the mode in which it
appears (electronic or handwritten), as well as laptops, cell phones and other electronic appliances,
programmable calculators, textbooks and study guides without the express previous consent of the
assessor. This can also include the following but are not restricted to:
o Copying from other students;
o Being in possession of and using notes and unauthorised graphic calculators, cell phones;
o Falsifying identification, and
o Substitution of material
o Any conduct by a student aimed at assisting another student to commit plagiarism or any other
form of academic dishonesty, including dishonesty during or related to exams.
3.2 Other forms of academic dishonest conduct
Dishonest conduct does not only occur during examinations but also in the context of other forms of
assessment such as assignments and other submissions. This includes matters such as copying from
another person, and the disguising of somebody else’s work in order to create the impression that it is the
work of the perpetrator himself.
Academic dishonesty or misconduct can also be perpetrated by:
Falsifying information regarding admission, claims for recognition of advanced standing, deferred
assessment or leave of absence;
Presenting copied, falsified or improperly obtained data as if it were the result of some research or
laboratory or field trips undertaken by the student;
Presenting individual work material which is the result of undue and unacceptable amount of assistance
from another person;
Assisting another student with presentation of individual work in contravention to instructions or
guidelines for that work.
3.3 Plagiarism and copyright infringement
Plagiarism means the presentation, without consent or reference to the source, of another person’s text or
other published intellectual product by creating the impression that it is the original work of the person
attempting to gain advantage from it or as the Oxford and The Essential English Dictionaries describe
plagiarise as “(t) take the work or an idea of somebody else and pass it off as its own” and “to present the
ideas or words of another as one’s own”.
Infringement of copyright is a statutory offence which can lead to criminal prosecution and fines. The
perpetrator may also be sued for damages in a civil action by the copyright owner, whilst plagiarism may
amount to unlawful conduct in terms of common law, which may also lead to lawsuits against the perpetrator.
Apart from the legal consequences, it is axiomatic that plagiarism and copyright infringement compromise
the integrity of academicism and is contrary to scientific ethics and society’s perception of moral values. It
should therefore be forbidden and, where it does occur, should be punished by the University as unlawful
In more detailed terms, one can identify instances of plagiarism as:
A pre-meditated act of presenting another person’s work or property without reference or
acknowledgement to the rightful owner, such as:
using another person’s ideas, work or research information without acknowledgement
copying verbatim sentences or paragraphs from one or more sources with no proper acknowledgement
paraphrasing closely sentences or paragraphs without acknowledgement
submitting computer material in part or in whole without stating its origin
for group projects, fraudulently representing the individual contributions of group members where
individual input is to be identified.
Policy on Plagiarism and other forms of Academic Dishonesty and Misconduct 2
Council and Senate are responsible for the existence and monitoring/review of a Policy on Plagiarism and
other forms of Academic Dishonesty and Misconduct.
The University has the responsibility of inculcating integrity and academic honesty in all students and staff,
especially those in academic positions. This responsibility can be complied with through the formulation and
publication of a clear policy about examination dishonesty and plagiarism, through the instruction of students
from an early stage about ethical research and referencing practices, as well as general academic honesty,
through the prominent placement of warnings against academic dishonesty and plagiarism (inter alia in study
material, photocopy machines and scanners) and through expecting of students to confirm, upon the
submission of independent academic work for assessment, that such work is their own original work (as per
the attached example Addendum A), and through punishing cases of academic dishonesty and plagiarism
suitably. The University therefore has both an educational, social and a disciplinary responsibility. Each
academic and student associated with the University has the personal responsibility of presenting all material
intended for academic assessment or research publication in a manner that is ethically and scientifically
The responsibilities of the lecturer in this regard can be spelled out as follows:
Notification to Students: Students taking modules within a School must be given information about
acceptable standards of integrity and academic honesty in conducting e.g. with respect to assessment,
referencing, acknowledgement and bibliography.
All module outlines must carry a reminder clause on plagiarism, cheating, academic dishonesty or
misconduct and copyright protection.
Provide students with standards of referencing and bibliography at the beginning of each course.
Advise them against giving or receiving help with assessment or work that is meant to be the work of an
4.2 Disciplinary processes
There are two levels of disciplinary action possible in cases of academic dishonesty: educational reprimand
and penalization in the context of the teaching-learning process, and the formal disciplinary process.
Reprimand is handled in the first instance during an interview by the lecturer (including in what follows below
a supervisor, promoter and assessor at any level) concerned, after notifying the director or dean of the
matter. The director or dean may take over the matter or leave the lecturer to handle it.
Where a lecturer becomes aware of or suspects that a student has acted dishonestly in the presentation of
work e.g. for purposes of academic assessment through, for example, copying the work of another student,
copying or paraphrasing material from the work of another student, an article, report, document or the
Internet without due acknowledgement that this is a quote, the lecturer has to confront the student with that
during an interview. The student should be given an opportunity to clarify the incident in the interview. The
interview should enable the lecturer to:
Close the case; or
Warn the student with or without nil mark and inform the director and dean as well as keep a record of
the action taken; or
Advise the director or dean that the student should be formally charged;
The lecturer must in every case submit a written report to the director with authentic evidence,
irrespective of the outcome of the case;
A student must always give written confirmation of the receipt of a reprimand or a warning;
A student who does not wish to accept the decision of the lecturer can appeal to the relevant school
director for a revision of the case. Any further requests for revision can then only be made after a
formal disciplinary process.
The disciplinary process runs according to the University’s Disciplinary Rules for Students and Staff
(depending on whether the student concerned is also a staff member), with due regard to the following
Policy on Plagiarism and other forms of Academic Dishonesty and Misconduct 3
The relevant school director does a preliminary investigation into allegations of plagiarism, academic
dishonesty or misconduct and submits the report to the disciplinary committee for student matters at the
campus level in the case of the person being a plain student or the Manager: Labour Relations in the
case of the person being a staff member.
The relevant lecturer may be called as a witness by the disciplinary committee.
Where the student/staff member is found guilty of plagiarism, academic dishonesty or misconduct by the
disciplinary committee a commensurate punishment is imposed in accordance with paragraph 6(1)-(9) of
the University Disciplinary Rules for Students or paragraph 8 of the Disciplinary Rules for Staff. Should
the disciplinary committee reprimand the student in terms of paragraph 6(10) this must be combined with
an additional punitive measure.
Any requests for revision or appeal are dealt with in terms of the Statute and University Disciplinary Rules
for Students and Staff.
4.3 Record keeping
School directors keep records of academic reprimands of students and all academic reprimands should be
referenced and kept according to the rules of the Records Management Policy of the NWU. Records on
academic reprimands should be placed on the official student file kept by Academic Administration/Services.
When a student is found guilty of plagiarism, academic dishonesty or misconduct by a disciplinary committee
the verdict and sentence imposed are recorded on the student’s academic record, especially for purposes of
providing accurate information to persons and institutions who have the right to such testimony of a student’s
conduct during his/her study career.
4.4 Detection of cases of academic fraud
Academic fraud in relation to admission, RPL, second-chance assessment or a selection process should
immediately be reported to the Director: Academic Services and relevant campus registrar, who have to
bring it to the attention of the Institutional Registrar.
If a student has been employed for 5 years and more, RPL may be followed. In order for you to receive recognition towards your further study in the Diploma in Grade R Teaching, you are participating in an RPL process. RPL is the abbreviation for Recognition of Prior Learning that acknowledges those competencies (activities that you can perform) which you have already acquired in the course of teaching.
To deliver proof of these competencies (which you may already have) you have to prepare a PORTFOLIO OF EVIDENCE, that will show what you can already do in the line of teaching. As such, the portfolio will contain your best efforts that reflect or show or prove your previously acquired knowledge, skills attitudes and values. You are also expected to demonstrate your ability to express your views on a variety of matters concerning your teaching. This portfolio will consist of 48 credits. The content of the portfolio will concentrate on your area of specialization, in this case Grade R, which you teach at school.
For any teacher training programme to be effective students must get an opportunity to apply their knowledge to a classroom situation. The Diploma in Grade R Teaching also consists of six Work-integrated Learning (WIL) modules. Students will complete one WIL module per semester where each WIL module carries 8 credits. These modules aim to equip students with the necessary pedagogical knowledge that will enable them to integrate and apply the knowledge they encounter in their academic modules with the authentic experience they get during work integrated learning in a school. Each module also includes a portfolio task to provide students the opportunity to demonstrate their ability to apply content knowledge in a practical situation. These modules aim to integrate the two types of practical learning, namely learning from practice and learning in practice. The WIL modules focus on learning from practice by guiding students in the implementation of competence based teaching activities. Students will need to implement these activities during the six week compulsory practicum period per year, and provide proof of applied competence in the form of a work- integrated portfolio.
Six months before the maximum study duration is exceeded and a student’s studies are finally terminated, the student will receive a warning letter from the Executive Director of the Unit for Open Distance Learning (UODL) to inform him/her of one final and once-off examination opportunity to successfully complete all outstanding modules. If there are still modules outstanding after the occurrence of such an exam opportunity, the studies of such a student will be terminated in terms of General Rules A2.4.8 (termination of studies) and A3.4.6 (unsatisfactory academic performance). Only in exceptional cases, and then on the grounds of irrefutable evidence, will the Executive Director of the UODL consider a request for continuation of studies from a student whose studies have been terminated. Should such an application be successful, the student will be afforded only one examination opportunity to complete all outstanding modules.